Are you trying to make yourself a victim? And even trying to frame it to make more Horde players to sympathize with you? lol
I thought you were not a snowflake and could handle direct talk, well…
Great way to start your survey - with lies and zero proofs, just to discredit others with another of your BS, when in previous post of similar speculations I told you that I’ve just tried IP change - it doesn’t work.
Hopelessly trying start so far…
Again, more tries to discredit…
You know, only ppl who lie need this much BS, to try and make themselves look good, by lying about others to make them look bad.
This is a pathetic start.
Alter outcome you like to see? Because objectivity is not why you did this survey, right?
Basically - allows you to control the narrative you want, so this whole thing is very subjective to how you like to manipulate it. Ok, got it.
Speaking from your own experience, haha
So you just discriminate opinion of players who play more than one faction, or don’t do raids and rated pvp - way to do a survey - very objective and believable, yeah…
Start with yourself - you started to do any PvP only a couple months ago, when you discovered self-healing shaman build - your opinion about WPvP is one of the least relevant.
And here we go - trying to manipulate survey even before it started. How desperate are you?
Ok, let’s answer it:
1.
No, I don’t agree. But there are parts of it, regarding tech and how it works that are bad.
Question note: Players can like parts of a system, and don’t like other parts. You’re trying to smash all together in hopes to get more answers you want.
2.
Rewarded - no, Incentivized - yes.
Blizzard talked about outnumbering officially in Dev blogs, you were even provided with a link a couple of times. I’m not a part of tinfoil hats and conspiracy theories, so I see bonus numbers in-game, I know Blizzard employees play both sides (from their interviews, were also linked multiple times), Ion “game director” plays Horde - for me that’s enough.
Question note: Heavily suggestive and leading question, with lies and speculation attached, in hopes that players would be stupid enough to be manipulated.
3.
I would like for both factions to have equal options for rewards.
I wish there were other mechanisms to stimulate participation, and discussed it, with possible ideas, many times.
Question note: More than one question in one, expecting just yes/no answer is very manipulative.
4.
No, I don’t agree.
I think there is no need to limit players options, just to make a workaround for AOO quest. A better way would be to change rewards/incentives system so it doesn’t need workarounds - like seasonal achievements, weekly quest and rewards based on player individual participation, for both factions equally… discussed many times in a few threads.
5.
Yes.
6.
There is no section “sharding+LFG”. If you mean “Sharding/phasing and LFG” in your opinions - that is not an objective information, and I won’t base my opinion on yours.
As for last part of the question - I would love if new technology - layering - was used to create big layers of combined realms (battle groups) - for both: faction balance and consistent community. With LFG-only limited to specific layer in War Mode… [Suggestion] Use Layering from Classic to improve Sharding
Question note: Heavily biased, suggestive and leading question, again with tries to manipulate with your own opinions.
7.
No. Everybody should be able to do WPvP and it doesn’t matter on what level they like to do it.
Question note: Questions 4, 5, 7 are with least amount of manipulation. I wish there was more questions like this.
That is only your very biased opinion.
More than a half of questions are not strait to the topic, heavily biased/suggestive/leading, lack any objectivity, have more than one question in them, and quite confusing - because yes/no is not even an answer of how those question were asked and what about.
So, you even clearly state that you want others to go in some specific direction with your questions… yeah, way to much trying, way to much manipulation, and it’s very clearly visible… you’ve made an oopsie, again.
So you’ve just decided that it’s more fair, because it’s more convenient for you and makes it easy to manipulate how you like it, dismiss what you don’t like, etc… and now you’re trying to convince others it is… well - you failed, it is not, as you can see at this point.
I doubt that you’ll get many answers - results probably be very scuffed. Plus, you could notice from all your time on these forums - many players really don’t like to read walls of text. And if you add all that amount of manipulation, well - good luck.
Maybe now you’ll see why ppl use 3rd party systems for surveys and make questions with different answers, in which not all answers could be acceptable for everybody, but they make for non-biased information gathering.
Everything is not black and white, no matter how hard you try to manipulate it.
With how you make this survey - it is not an opinion of community - it’s your biased view about opinions of others, and nothing more.
Will you try to use your forum alts again? 