Wtf is up with loot?

Thats at least something.

And unluckyness will strike on people’motivation to noot play certain content especially when it comes to making the sence of progression. I am sololely doing a mythic plus here and there this week for GV only, cause its not worth doing more.

Raid had 5+2 coins.

So instead of 30 possiuble drops, you had 50+2 and depending if you had saved those coins up, +5 since you could held up to at least 5.

But whom all complained about loot showers when the majority of complaints where about TF which nobody is asking for?

See the thing is that we ain’t in BfA and that overfeeding nonsense has ended so if you want to get more stuff you need to work for it :man_shrugging:t2:

So my 6-7 hours of work is not worth 1 loot peace according to you when the ilvl = invalidated come week 7, when PVP work 3 hours for multiple items…

You litterally dont have much to work for but are enforced to heroic raid to properly improve your ilvl or be lucky with GV

Ohh stop twisting the argument dude XD No one said anything about how much is your time worth.

It’s simple. You want more then work more and you need to accept the fact that even if they increase drop chance you still can end up in that unlucky % of people who get less but it doesn’t mean that loot drop needs to be increased :man_shrugging:t2:

Twisting words? Uhm, OKay…

sighs Look, did I care if I didnt get loot for three/four runs in a BFA mythic dungean? No.

Because it simply gave me one thing: Sence of progression.

1 loot in 12 dungeans ios the opposite, and come week7 that content is rendered useless. But thanks,s aying I twist words!

I said that if you want more then you should work more and you changed it into some BS that according to me the time you spend on M+ isn’t worth an item :roll_eyes:

You are trying to defeat my argument by attacking a different argument which I didn’t make. It’s called strawman argument and it’s fallacious BS :rofl:

The fact that you are doing it shows that you don’t have anything substantial to say so you are talking nonsense just to keep arguing cuz idk “reasons” :man_shrugging:t2:

Besides you keep using the same argument over and over which is 1 item in 12 dungeons which doesn’t sound like it’s common but rather you got unlucky once and you got salty and keep whining about it instead of moving on.

1 Like

Whatever you say… :o Come back when half of your content is made useless later on okay?

Come back when you have something else to say than salty whining based on one example :kissing_heart:

Please :wink:

All I can see here is you wanting another loot shover because you want a casual easy time :man_shrugging:t2:

“All I can see”.

Okay?

So what about my sence of progression in content?

LFR = made useless

Normall raid = made semi useless, doenst scale with GV, and only the last two bosses are really usefull.

M6 and less are made useless, which is the content I play mostly.

You do realize that increasing loot drop makes lower content obsolete faster? :woman_facepalming:t2: :man_facepalming:t2:

? It has always sufficed us casuals to at least pull to the next tier…

But you will get sufficient ilvl for next tier :man_shrugging:t2:

I dont think I will respond to you anymore, you’re becoming very narrowminded.

You are some new kind of Blizzard apologist.

First you say this.

But when someone told you that you talk BS you suddenly changed line of argumentation to this:

In a moment we will see you trying to convince us that luck is part of the skill and dedication, and unlucky = lazy and entitled. You people truly believe luck = effort, because if you loot = you earned it of course.

1 Like

Two different responses to two different arguments but keep nitpicking :roll_eyes:

Nope, they connect directly, that was one post after another in the very same chain of discussion. You will just defend this system no matter what argument people give you because you are probably one of lottery winners …for now.

So? Two different arguments can’t be about the same thing? lol… :woman_facepalming:t2: :man_facepalming:t2:

Is there sme kind of law that indicates two arguements cant be?

\What a nutcase