I rest my case, then,
Perhaps Blizzard ought to describe it better next time then how the process of fleshcrafting, genocide and so forth works, in every minute, minuscule detail.
I rest my case, then,
Perhaps Blizzard ought to describe it better next time then how the process of fleshcrafting, genocide and so forth works, in every minute, minuscule detail.
You have managed to accurately pinpoint the exact opposite of the point.
I mean I donât care either. Iâd rather it didnât happen in the game and would be happy if it moved to more appropriate platforms, but if I donât see it, not much I can/will do. Youâre putting words in my mouth when I never said them.
But youâre trying to make this point in a thread thatâs for a guild where the GM is known to pursue female players/characters for ERP, has ERP enshrined as the most integral part of his guildâs concept, so I think the circumstances are just the slightest bit different.
As for Naxxramas, spooky background sounds and explanation that nasty stuff happened =/= going into extreme detail about how the women and children were killed and stitched together. Thereâs the difference and thatâs what youâre ignoring to suit your own argument.
The Christian bit aside, correct.
I donât mind disagreeing, but some basic reading comprehension is always appreciated.
Having an in-game representation of various grotesque scenes does not give the right to a player to type any explicit grotesque texts in the in-game channels. Garrosh saying his famous line to Sylvannas does not allow players to use strong language in their day-to-day roleplay in-game because it is said so in CoC.
It is Blizzardâs game and they are free to decide what is allowed and what isnât for the players.
After my while of roleplaying in Stormwind, I dare say roleplayers donât particularly follow that rule.
I donât know boys, the older novels sure had some off scenes with some particular sexism and even alluding to rape in a particular case That, and, how does one explain Argusâ monstrosities which are definitely rather well-described in how children were murdered for vile purposes? Thatâs rhetoric, by the way, Iâll answer.
Graphics. Thatâs why WoW is so overly cartoony, because they can continue portraying whatever violent act could/should fall under the 16+ label. But by not meeting the visual criteria, they keep it 12+ (I was interested since âbut violenceâ is an argument Iâve used, so have discussed & looked about).
In my opinion, thatâs actually badâfrom Blizzardâs part, entirely. Theyâre trying to retain a bigger audience ($$$) by expanding who can and canât play the game, but war & moral issues arenât really a kiddie thing.
And Iâm sorry, Iâll entirely ignore forum politics & justice law enforcement over a video game because letâs be real: do you think Jaina/Sylvanas/Azshara Warbringers were created for a kid? Do you think the novels and whatever complexity they have left in modern day is good reading material for a kid? They donât contain whatâs illegal by (inter)national laws sure, but the audience is rather clear. WoW isnât being picked up by 12 y/olds anymore, they think games like these are dumb (source: I taught a few years back).
PS: and before forum politics nitpick, no Iâm not saying ERP/aggressively descriptive violence is ok for just RPing out on the street
Doesnât stop people from reporting that equally as they report ERP. Another thing is that no one bothers doing that.
how long until WoW will portray some loli awfulness cuz âitâs fine cuz itâs so cartoonishâ
I mainly think that those arenât in the actual game, so the relevance eludes me.
I think thatâs meant to say ânot sayingâ, if Iâm reading you right.
You arrived at that thought concerningly quickly.
carps. editingâŚ
Can I take you for a stroll to Lionâs Pride?
because the topic was literally cartoonish sexual content and violence and the dude already eliminated violence, donât be a deviant xo
Big if true
Iâm just saying man thereâs a few more stops before you arrive at loli, damn nelves.
(to be clear Iâm just messing with you, not accussing you of anything)
I am concerned, because I find it plausible. Sexual suggestion is entirely ok for PG12 . . .
cease
we have to think of the worst outcome possible so we can prevent it, and go from thereâŚ
When you realise youâve posted 47 times in a Bayerleyn thread (48 now). Tehya, do I have a problem??
A number of people on AD have an odd fascination with WW2 Germany and I canât help but get the feeling they romanticise it quite a bit whenever I see glimpses of it.
Well, not necessarily a fascination since itâs all good, trendy and cool to meme about it âironicallyâ these days. You know, as a joke that is less so the more itâs repeated and further down the rabbit hole we goâŚ
The peculiar nature of the lord bayerleinâs name has been pointed out a while prior to such behaviour rising to prominence. On the whole, I find that the usual outrage over the usual exploits and disingenuity of all parties to fuel discussion functions as an impressively effective distraction from such difficult questions.