Added to the fact that he acknowledges BOTH are strong, it doesn’t mean they CANT move.
It means that neither side WANTS to move because it means that every advancement would have an equally serious backlash.
I wasn’t the one that added some extra meaning charge by going “Stalemate could also mean that…”.
It’s a theory the second you take the literal definition and take it the step further into “And it’s the kind of stalemate that has the Alliance being stronger”. It’s a theory. A wrong one given the source.
One second you deny comparing them and now you ask why it’s relevant, effectively admitting it.
I never said stalemate could also mean that.
I said what it does mean. With confidence. Because I know I am correct about the meaning, as backed up by frozen, ashenbrand and the fact that I have working brain cells.
I didn’t even just offer you a definition I offered context on how the word came to be.
Yeah, I admit I said that both collectives aren’t comparable.
Again, all this nitpicking responds to some purpose?
And I quoted another definition of the word, that instantly redirected me to the definition that supported the fact that both sides were par on strength.
You randomly said that I was comparing the Horde with the Taliban, and used a quote that has me literally saying that both situations aren’t comparable.
Why???
Like, the comparison wasn’t even brought up by me. I just argued against its validity.
How about you check that wonderful dictionary of yours that you love so much and check all the different meanings of the word “Compare” or “Comparison”?
Gladly. Namely, I was under the impression that you were saying that the Horde isn’t the Taliban while Ashenbrand did not even argue about that.
They just brought up an example of why the word “stalemate” can mean more things. To explain further, I did not argue that you spotted any similarity or equality between the Horde and the Taliban, I said that such a statement is completely irrelevant as no one even seriously compared the two different situations. That’s my point.
That wasn’t really what I wanted to express. I just meant that both examples weren’t equatable and further clarified that the context Saurfang gave us regarding his interpretation of stalemate, supported what I said about it being something between two equally strong forces with mirrored footing on both continents.
Which is something that further distances from the kind of examples that resonate with the Taliban case