that one person joining a guild raid will be able to see that the loot rules are set to master looter and then not join if they dont like it.
account wide everything within reason could work, but if someone focuses on 1 character then they should be able to stay ahead of people playing multiple, so account wide to a point would be fine.
he MAYBE knows whats best for tournaments (doubt it).
but he does not know whats best for most of the players.
most player need to balance life, job and hobbies and wow. he just needs to balance life and wow.
wow, in its nature, is NOT a competitive game.
How about arguing his points then, actually watch the video and argue the points … oh wait, that wouldn’t really fit in your narrative since he goes out of his way to show that some things that would benefit him as a world first raider would be terrible for the game as a whole and should never be a thing.
You are unable to see the game in any other way than the one you play it as, and you hate on people who see it from different point of view.
i dont know what his hobbies are. but unlike the average player, wow is NOT his hobby. he treats wow like its his job. most players arent looking at wow as a work tool. they loot at it as a hobby.
Then watch the video, and argue why his points would make it worse to enjoy your hobby … ?
I find it truly amazing how much time some people argues his person instead of the points he makes, i mean wtf … ?
You can’t be for that, since you disagree with Max, i mean … he’s a .1% so you disagree, as he wants proper player housing not tied to silly player power or functionality like garrisons. Therfore you must disagree with that being added.
most of the stuff they mention has already been brought up on the forums and discussed but at soon as someone on twitch or YouTube says the same thing you treat it like it’s the someone trying to destroy the game and twist it to their needs.
Obviously people care or they wouldn’t watch them, having a audience doesn’t all of a sudden dilute your opinion…
No but for some people the fact that they have an audience means that their opinion should be invalid apparently.
So they actually give viability to a larger crowd of feedbacks.
Strange, the person you agreed with before just said they just value their own self righteous opinion.
Mmmmmmm.
Said by the person the watched the video picture and decided to argue with a person they did not even listen.