Being gay is not political.
At all.
But enforcing it into art can be a political statement.
ok and?
how does this make gay people in videogames bad?
You used āseemedā twice.
That is your interpretation of a fact. Not reality.
They forced two characters to be gay in order to signal that they are a āmodernā company. Thatās what is political.
Ughā¦ the āconservatives decide unilaterally that no pejorative terms may be applied to themselves, because thatās the real oppressionā faux-victim canard.
No, if someone is being transparently homophobic, then it should indeed be called out.
If there is the suspicion that someone is telegraphing/grooming for homophobic recruits, amongst other gamers on a forum, that should also be called out.
Imho, the ridiculous concept of a heterosexually approved way of introducing/revealing LGBT characters, is blatant homophobic gatekeeping.
No. A SOCIAL statement.
So this by default makes them straight, thus change? Flynn is a flamboyant guy, flirting with everyone. His and Tās relationship was platonic. But, lets say, it wasnāt, letās say he really had a crush on her. By default, he canāt fall for a man?
If this is how simple you think, iād ask you to go and meet gay people and hear from them how things work.
They werenāt gay until a racist arbitrarily decided to write them to be despite no prior indication of that orientation and in both cases EVERY indication that they were as straight as could be. All with no build-up between the two what so ever.
It aināt negating anything to call out this disgusting practice and anyone who supports it.
Begone.
no.
the writer of Flynn literally stated he was made a bisexual character from the start.
read. lore.
No it isnāt.
Itās a social thing. Not political.
And also; I disagree they āforced two characters to be gayā.
Their orientation never came up (except for peopleās own assumptions based on little events - but those donāt really mean anything). Now it did. Thatās not forcing anything.
At least we have the word āseemedā when it comes to their straight relationship possibilities, they didnāt seem like gays at all, not at all, zero sign-hint.
Who talks about it at all? All we imply is that the Democratic Party of the USA is spreading a political message through big tech companies, Hollywood, software products, and most importantly Facebook and Twitter. And this political message is reaching MY country too.
When did that author state so exactly? Also at the start? Or maybe just now?
Thatās YOUR interpretation of it. And thatās fine, but that doesnāt mean thatās the way it was.
In the case of Shaw and Flynn we got confirmation outside of the game, they were never intended to be bisexual, but were rather changed on a whim because it was poppular with the community. The first conformation was during and interview with Denuser where he was put on the spot, much like J.K. Rollings āDumbledore is gayā thing, and look how that turned out, it was neither genuane nor sincere, tell me honetly if you didnt know that tweet existed would you have interprited the āmore than brothers lineā in FB2TCoG the way you do now ?
Stop saying āBegoneā Iāll have you know this Forum has a registered quota on people who talk as if their opinion was the Voice of God (Insert deity here) and I already fill that role!
Two people fall in love without prior indication nor do they need to make it obvious.
There was no indication Flynn and Shaw were straight. They werenāt portrayed as straight or gay. Nothing was said on who they like to spend their free time with.
It was YOUR assumption.
Begone, peasant the Void Queen is tired of you.
Eh actually you can stay i like you.
They were, Flynn was shown to have a strong interest in women and Shaw was hinted at having a thing for Valeera, however they were not portraid to have a thing for men aswell.
who gives a flying eff about the democrats?
Also and once again, why is this a bad thing? And why is it bad that media with gay people is reaching your country, hmm?
iām not gonna root through months of dev tweets just to make a point.