in-game i tend to only block obvious trolls (and am in fact far quicker about doing so). I might block others from time to time, but thatâs usually a very temporary measure that ends the moment they skedaddle/the day ends.
Yeah, I can understand why those sort of posters would end up on a list. 100% fair.
I still maintain there is a slippery slope, and further that a list made by one person shouldnt be the de facto âwhitelistâ for the forums. There should be an ignore function however, its a part of practically every social media platform anyway, primarily to protect from harassment (which is what this workaround should have been posted as).
Except you could do just that on the previous forums, and AD was still notorious for being a drama hole.
The effects of removal of thoughts and dissenting opinions by way of the block function is just overstated. The people who will use it are probably blocking people that no longer will, or can, argue with in any good faith anyway. I think if I discovered I was blocked by anyone, Iâd be grateful theyâve done that instead of following me everywhere making jabs and quips.
Nevermind that a block workaround has long been available, and also long been discussed and advertised by other prominent AD members such as Rogmasha, and the forums havnât exactly crumbled.
The main difference was the advertising of a personal list which, yes, was flying a bit too close to the sun.
Totes. My inoffensive presence has yet to earn me threats and if they did, theyâd be reported. I did get some hate mail in the past and rumours going around but it just served to open my eyes to the rot of things.
It doesnât happen to me and in this am blessed, I guess. Even if they did, why bother? Mcnugget wonât nugget forever but a gold bot might, so thatâs to be ignored, hypothetically.
I canât really fight the echo chambers by now as itâs far too late for that, but I can point out how this sort of thing hints at a problem we should tackle with more constructive things than browser extensions to shrink our frames of reference.
Could be anyone, though. This sort of thing is just likely to worsen the mutually exclusive bubbles that atomize the server. I guess I just wonât get it with my own perspective.
So I do suspect.
The thread speaks for itself thus far?
Depending on how you go about it, definitely so.
Well, we disagree on the social impact of these things. From my frame of reference, the chill, fine option is to leave things be instead of adding to the social anxiety of the server culture with blocklists and addons. It does a lot more harm than the superficial comfort of silencing that one person, ya know.
I think thereâs been plenty of people who have voiced their dislike over the list already, myself included, and it has been since then removed. So youâre really just retreading old ground.
a lot of this i think boils down to: this example hasnât happened to me and therefore this is unhealthy and hatemongering
if you donât get harassed, made uncomfortable by targeted posts, or get involved in drama, good for you, well done, but there are some of us that do and our complaints are very valid
I watch with glee as the smug grin plastered on Athramusâ face quickly sours into a grimace at the realisation that soon he will cease to exist for a large number of people.
I just donât want to read long-winded gasbags who I find terribly boring and donât offer anything I find interesting to the discussion.
If I donât want to view those that should be my choice - why oppose that unless the angle is that itâs a bad thing to deprive said individuals in dire need of an editor and several rewrites?
If anything I take grievance with those turning up their nose trying to decide what is best for me to view like some overly concerned authority figure. To nobodyâs surprise they are the exact same that would end up on my hypothetical block list. Imagine that!
(Iâm not challenging you Scrappy Iâm just tagging on because you made a point in favour of blocking )
r/iamverysmart posters tend to be something I can get a good laugh from at times, but I can get those people can get very tiring to deal with.
Bigger problem Iâve had with people on AD has been them claiming something about myself, only to not provide any evidence to back their claims and saying âYou were a part of -This group- so of course it means you are like the worst offenders of that particular group in itâs 10 years worth of players.â Which in fact becomes quite the sad, spineless thing to pull when later on one can see the same people posting reasonable stuff like âNot every person in a Guild is the same as the worst in it. Every Guild has bad peopleâ.
As previously stated, your comments regarding my being unfunny (being untrue and misguided) are of course of no moment to me, BUT, you did say that I was being
and
which, if indeed I was being ironic, would be both untrue and unfair, but more importantly than that - and, I think, the most egregious sin - theyâd have nothing to do with any of my points. Yet again, itâs a discussion which has devolved into ad hominem attacks and a focus -
So my question to you is which of my actual ideas - i.e, my stated opinions, my supported positions - did you find objectionable, and why? And where have I myself likewise insulted another poster?
And by the way, I think itâs important to state - so that my intentions cannot be misconstrued, only misrepresented - that when I took issue with Vixiâs post, it wasnât for any spurious reason. I donât know Brigante personally, have never RPâd with him, have both agreed and disagreed with him on the forums, and have no knowledge of wrong-doing on either side of the conflict - so my defence wasnât out of spite for the PCU - as demonstrated here -
nor for love or loyalty to Brigante. I took issue with it because, to me, it represents one of the biggest unaddressed problems on the forums, which is the manufacturing of âgoodâ targets for the mob to pillory, and the fabrication of narratives of outrage.