For 2 expansions now I have been wanting to play the Warrior. I love the fantasy and ability to collect nearly every type of weapon MOG, and on top of that the gameplay is fun.
But…
And that’s a big but…
For 2 expansions I have also heard things about the Warrior that scares me away from it and makes me go DK instead…
Every time I check online, Fury is seen as a “mediocre spec” that you play for any solo content, since it is the only Warrior spec that can heal itself during a fight.
Arms on the other hand is praised for it’s utility and PvP capabilities, and is often the “go-to PvP spec”… however the problem is that it ONLY works if you have a healer backing you up. As Arms your survivability is useless without a healer.
So here is my dilemma…
I love playing Fury, and I love PvP…
You see where this is going?
So if I want to PvP, Arms is first choice because it is considered top tier for PvP. However it relies on a healer… To me personally, specs that RELY on healers is something I avoid like the plague…
I can’t do BGs or WPvP with Arms unless I have a healer team mate constantly babysitting me…
So let’s take Fury then… Fury looks and feels amazing to play. But it is like having to “settle with the bad spec”… Basically if I wanna play my favorite spec in the PvP content I enjoy, I have to come to terms with always being considered a mediocre spec…
Am I wrong with how I see Warrior?
Once and for all, is Warrior a good choice in my case? If not then I will put Warrior to rest and just accept that Warrior is “a fun class that only works in team based content”, and that’s all it is.
And please no “play it if you like it” answers I’m well aware that Warrior is fun, but that’s not what I’m looking for here.