The sub grants access and borrowing rights to a character. Nothing more. You pay for expo content, but the content that is not behind money, is free as part of the sub price.
Point me to where the EULA stipulates your sub gives you rights of ownership to anything In the game please, or even a guarantee of opportunity to get it.
If you can’t do that, I suggest you spend your time on a more moderately paced task like finding your finger and removing from the caps lock.
I asked you a question, now care to answer it rather than engage in whataboutery?
Calling me a lawyer or shill doesn’t make you correct, it just makes you look sore for realising you’re incapable of doing what I asked.
I’m no lawyer, I just actually read stuff like a EULA and realise what my money actually gets me, and what it does not. I recommend it. It’s certainly a better approach to living than not reading terms and agreements and then shaking my first at imagined slights and breaches of contract that exist in my head.
Did I say I think blizzard have a cool business model? No. Did I say I like the sub plus store model? No. I just stated the facts. Interesting how your response to that is to assume my position in these matters so as to “make me the enemy”.
Yes it does you absolute…
You pay for the expansion and the patches that follows the damn expansion. It’s just that that content isn’t processed yet, but you paid access to anything that follows up in the damn expansion that you bought at launch of said expansion.
Your sub is just continued access to said content.
Guys, is Blizzard paying you for this stuff? Get a grip of yourself.
Sorry, I don’t need to further engage with you. You are doing more than just stating things. You are actively defending Blizzard and using terms as “free content” in a game you pay a damn subscription for, and on top, you already paid access to the new content in the form of an expansion.
Rofl this "bubble. No, you can’t even refute my points. You paid for the expansion at launch and it’s Blizzard’s deal to develop further patches for it.
You are in a bubble.
Ah, the classic “I don’t need to” response to cover the fact you can’t do it.
Your payment of an expo does not relate to specific volumes of content and never has. If it did that would assume blizzard know the content in advance and stick to it, and we know from SL they generate what is and isn’t to be done as they go along.
You aren’t allowed to sell people a product and then not deliver it, and it’s considered shady practice to sell people a promise that is open to violation. The expo fee is literally related to access to whatever content is developed around that expo, but it does not relate to a specific amount of content in and of itself outside of stuff like races or classes.
If it did, every expo would be grounds for refund wherever blizzard deviate from an initial plan or promise. Notice how that’s not the case. This is because your payment is not for a certain content, it is for access to whatever content the development team works on. Whether they stick to any promises or not is not part of it at all.
No because you just use fancy words and hope they’ll stick. Using terms as “free ingame content” in a pay to play subscription based game… What a joke.
And yet Blizzard has exactly been doing that practise since vanilla wow and up to WotLK hadn’t need to use of a store mount. That’s weird how things work don’t they?
Potato, potato.
Oh I can accept it, but when they’re wrong and it affects me as a consumer aswell? Hmm no.
Not really. However it would be a poopshow without equal if they would do that. Otherwise they could simply name 9.1 10.0 and say “new dlc! Buy now!” to fit what youre saying.