I’m not sure if I get it, you say that we reach different conclusions even when you concluded yourself earlier that they were banned by Blizzard? How?
From all these of your own written observations we see Blizzard took action on your reports and they got banned (they re-appear ofcourse in the same zone on new bots) yet you also refute your own observation by asking how you know they got banned?
And that there’s a different opinion??
What is missing? How did you reach a total different conclusion after your own observation?