I don’t know why adults who throw tantrums about it do that, but I agree it’s silly and makes them dumber than a child.
In the classroom this’ll become an accepted norm where we say “oh yes the owl does have three legs, that’s strange. They may want to catch three mice hehehehe”, at which point the child will probably ask a variant of what/how they’ll store/do with three mice, with the adult attempting to brush the childs bafflement under the carpet, often with time as an excuse to not engage ‘difficult’ topics.
I’m risking a rant but the classroom, in the UK at least, is under a heavy time factor. Things are fast, they start fast, they end suddenly and they move on quickly.
My phonics group, that I do allow to drift to ‘awkward’ topics on occasion, has a sharp and limited 40 minute window (in theory, it’s usually more like 20 because they arrive late as other factors snowball) and the -only- reason I can permit any drift at all is because I have a high speed group who do the work quickly and, to their credit, generally brilliantly. If I had a group that was slower or less capable, I’d have to end any devitation to other topics immediately.
Many of us would love to be able to sit down and engage with the children seriously about topics that aren’t maths, english and… maths and english. But if we do then we run out of time and then there’s discussions about children not progressing, school targets not being met etc. Granted that all affects the teacher more than myself, I have more room to drift into casual conversation that allows topics like AI, stiffling of creativity, social issues etc but even then it’s very limited.
(also laws that say we can’t say things that are obviously wrong are obviously wrong because we might upset a bigots feelings etc)
ANd of course I’m not responsible for the views of their parents who may love this slop, which counters any effort anyway so. Yeah.
I hate earth, can we go to mars.