Trust Level 3 + Flag Abuse ACC bound šŸ§ (update)

MVP can lose their trust levels like any other poster. I think some of the inactive MVPs are just alts, under the old system all your character became MVPs, under discourse only a nominated character is the MVP. This is true in my case and all my alts are just regulars as I didnā€™t become an MVP until weā€™d moved to discourse.

The trust levels are dependent on activity so you donā€™t have people go ham, get it then ignore the forums and still forever maintain that level. Itā€™s a perk for active participants in the forums. I donā€™t personally have a problem with them decaying.

3 Likes

2 Likes

I donā€™t think you understood my post. I meant that the MVPs should lose their MVP status if theyā€™re inactive for a long time, if we are going to lose trust level 3 for not being active enough.

Well, you see, I do. Good for you if you donā€™t I guess. And by the way, Iā€™m active and yet I donā€™t have the trust level 3.

I did understand, thatā€™s why I explained that a lot of the MVPs are not inactive, itā€™s that their alts also have MVP status under the old system.

We just have different views, thatā€™s all. As I mentioned before I think that it would be more helpful if posters could see what they are short on when it comes to going up a level and what they were lacking when they lose trust levels. Other than a fresh character itā€™s very hard to track where you are up to.

1 Like

3 Likes

Then remove the status from the alts. Itā€™s the same for trust level 3. Itā€™s character specific.

Or they could just scrap this stupid social experiment.

Im active and donā€™t have TL3 but we have both had banā€™s its how It goes you have to start from all over again if you are to stand a chance of getting it without one flag or silence which if you are not liked on the forums is pretty hard to do .
I have no idea why you are being aggersive to Puny either she is just telling you how it is no need to take it out on her .

3 Likes

Yes, thatā€™s what I have a problem with. Having to start over.

Because Iā€™m well aware of how it works and sheā€™s just stating the obvious like Iā€™m stupid or something. Iā€™m hardly a newbie on these forums.

She is not that type of person to do that at all I know you are annoyed at losing it but make a ticket and not be grumpy at wrong person (I know iam bad for that myself)

1 Like

There probably should be a cleanup in the mvpā€™s yes. If they are no longer active and posting, why are they still mvp? :woman_shrugging:t3:

3 Likes

Itā€™s down to Blizzard to decide how they handle things imported from the old forums. We have the odd discussion topic that never auto locks and stuff like that too. Itā€™s probably more effort than itā€™s worth to un MVP every MVP alt. Ultimately itā€™s their choice how they run things.

As for the Trust Levels they arenā€™t a social experiment. Discourse is used by a variety of companies and itā€™s aim is to encourage social interaction not harm it. If you are active you passively gain perks, if you drop in activity you lose those perks. That includes MVPs. If you get in to trouble and are temporarily banned from the forums, your progress is reset

Discourse has all sorts of features and Blizzard choose to use it in a way that suits them best.

1 Like

Hmmmm

To be a good person and bless wow forums with epic gif game

OR

Stay true to myself and keep the freedom to tell f.off to anyone that deserves it.

Decisions, decisions :thinking:

2 Likes

3 Likes

Aka a social experiment. Everything which has an impact on social interactions is a social experiment. And Iā€™d say that resetting someoneā€™s progress because they got flagged by some salty kid or have been a bit inactive on giving likes is definitely harmful.

I disagree, I donā€™t see anything experimental about it. You either gain the level and maintain it or you donā€™t.

If it was placed to encourage social interactions, then itā€™s a social experiment.

Itā€™s not an experiment if it works though?

That is your opinion, I can see that. I see it as a system that is in place without any experimentation.

A salty poster can not do anything to your TL. If you break the rules that report will be upheld. If you did nothing wrong it will just be a buried post.

So I guess all the experiments which work arenā€™t really experiments?

What he is trying to say isā€¦when you put such a system in place whilst simultaneously allowing the ā€œcancel cultureā€ to thrive through salty posters with alts that network with other assorted salt posing as players, itā€™s kinda not encouraging socializing but merely group think.