That’s not a good excuse to declare war on the alliance. Anyone could have done the same then.
“Since you never know if your neighbor will cause you problems in the future, even if you are currently at peace, you eliminate him just in case”
That’s not a good excuse to declare war on the alliance. Anyone could have done the same then.
“Since you never know if your neighbor will cause you problems in the future, even if you are currently at peace, you eliminate him just in case”
I mean if you where in the posistion of the Horde… truthfully?
Starting a war based on an assumed future only makes you a criminal. Then put yourself in the position of the alliance. They would have reasons to annihilate the horde then, after 4 wars.
yeah that definitely sounds like that, preemptive strike the neighbor just in case and at best to exterminate them so they can’t attack even if you was not certain that they planned to attack or not
Well that is and not gonna lie… How the lore was written
That only indicates that indeed, the alliance has better morale than the horde, with which, the question of this thread is answered.
never question that… But sometimes the Alliance does bad things too. Rare as they may be
Anyway, if you play alliance, and you do the cata, mop and BFA campaigns, you feel like a punching bag.
Let me explain: The horde razes alliance cities to the ground and massacres civilians, but in the alliance, when we invade Stonard, for example, they order us not to kill those who don’t fight, allowing them to flee to the dreadmaul post.
In Taurajo, the alliance allowed the civilians to escape by opening a corridor for them (Although they ended up trapped by brambles).
Jaina had the opportunity to raze all of Orgrimmar and Durotar using the focusing iris, but she did not do so, even though her city was completely razed.
After all the damage the horde has done, the alliance always offers peace after the defeat of their leaders, without retaliating.
It is frustrating to see how in many missions the horde annihilates civilians without mercy, while you, as an alliance, are ordered to spare their lives all the times.
I don’t feel that Teldrassil has been avenged. Not even Tyrande decides to kill Sylvanas…
Nha like I support literally everything you just said xD Cause I was right there saying everything you just did too.
But! Everyone in this thread cant accept like the one or two times! ever! the Alliance might have been the bad guys xD and now I am a total Erevien!
But I agree with you… And I used to say exactly what you just posted too.
Yes, every single time.
Lol I argue with people about this very thing… And this youtube video ends up in my recommendations.
He also spared Gul’dan because he “invented” Death Knights.
Is is though? I mean Blizzard claim plan expansions (which includes stories) way in advance. I mean we can only speculate if that is true, but if so it means that the decision to make Sylvanas serve the Jailor could have been made long before the book was ever written.
Is it though? I mean I would hope so going by what blizzard them selves states and say…
I am basing this purely off of how they said the ‘‘Burning of Teldrassil is a morally grey area’’ Pre BFA launch…
then we get the book and the in game event after witch was anything -but- A morally grey area… Like it couldn’t have been a more clear cut diamond even if they tried.
I agree. Buut one of the excuses for SL was that was still Afrosalamis work, who “left” at the start of BfA (I think). This suggests that SL at the very least started there, it’s not that out of the question that they could have had Sylvanas’ whole arc complete way before that.
Also did anyone actually buy the whole “moraly grey” and “Who dun it” thing? The image of Sylvanas standing in front of the burning Teldrasill was how they unveiled the expansion. Most of us knew it wasn’t going to be morally grey and that it was going to be Sylvanas that lit the first torch…
Up until it actually happen… Lets just say the Horde fanbase remained Hopeful it couldn’t be ‘‘That stupid it was true’’…
Why was it stupid? Sylvanas has been evil ever since she jumped off ICC, and I am not talking about the Jailor retcon.
Because when the horde had been the villain plot so many times before and lost several warchiefs too it before. And when Blizzard them self it was going to be a ‘‘Morally grey area’’ We actually believed it.
The Horde fanbase is burned out on this.
You had only lost 1 warchief because of “suddenly villains” but sure.
Killing Vol’Jin was mistake.
Lol
Dude the Alliance fanbase is burned out by this. Like Ðelenis said, each time you guys start a war we don’t really get to do anything, we just become punching bags until we have to team up with the Horde to stop the Horde and get handed some victories. And that’s why I don’t want to go back to faction war stories, because that is the only way Blizzard knows how to write these. If the Alliance become the bad guys, you will end up teaming up with “the good Alliance” to stop the Alliance. Then He-who-secretly-want-to-reroll-Alliance will lose his mind (well more so than now).
Does it matter? Amon I am not looking for a fight with you. Are you really gonna get hung up on the amount of warchief’s we have lost to lore plots?
Like do you guys see a Skullfox post and your mind just immidetely goes… ‘‘How can I argue with this?’’