They are still examples used to show spectators certain aspects of the race mindset.
Blizzard took care to make their plea a founded one, and taking either as oddities, seems to go against the very reason of their existance in this story.
We can’t have the story addressing each and every BE and how they think.
That’s when writers throw around cases that are used as examples to represent a bigger collective.
In all, i doubt that the only relevant BE characters BfA had, are to be considered exceptions to the rule.
Well…there were several quotes that had LTT screaming for Jaina’s head. I’d say that’s pretty vengeful.
No.
Prosecuting war when it suits you doesn’t turn you into a warmonger. Falling in line behind a factional war that could in the end work towards your personal goals isn’t acting as a fool.
Given we start on a basis that he indeed supported it in the end, I expected LTT to follow on this war for as long as the circumstances facilitated certain degree of comeuppance from his point of view. Or served to settle any score he might feel was left unanswered.
In both cases, and regardless of how things devolved in the end, i could see how he would be fooled to believe that could be the case. Much like Saurfang was.
Having him make a 180 heel-turn, and halt his support for a series of values/reasons that little have to do with the character, IS the alienating part.
Throwing about concepts such as praising Baine’s values, or Jaina’s honour (over the body of another beaten Sunreaver), is the sort of wrong buttons to push to explain why would LTT cease to support this war.
Because for the rest of it, worst case scenario you can argue ignorance.
I don’t think they went as far as revering her. He seems to weight the good and the bad, and acknowledges a ton of the bad.
Still, it also leans of a sympathetic trait that i feel wouldn’t be hard to exploit in order to explain why would he initially support the allies that helped him secure his land (specially when led by the person that died defending it).