Why the level 58 boost is bad for the game #stoptheboost

:smiley: Before i start i should explain what i ment with valid. Its a reason i can relate if i flex my empathiemuscle. Not the other ones that are crab und show a shortsight of thinking. Furthermoore they were only linked to the impact of the boost for boting and selling gold. From a moral standpoint i did not found a valid reason for the boost, but that not surprising, we both know that belives and values not change easily regardless how strange they may be :wink:

The valid points i saw where in a talk with Sorzza who is a pro-booster but has real logical reasons why and can outline them.
I will post some bits of the confersation where we tried to understand our differences:

This made me think that is is possible that the boost could not be as bad for the eco as is initally thought, because he had a valid point here.
Overall goldcost is lower, the high consumesprices should be lower and everyone will have - by default more gold - just natural via dailys.
Dont get me wrong, i think boosting will create alot of (invinsable)bots and this will ensure that goldselling is at its potentional maxium when it comes to sales, but maybe it is not as bad as i thought.
I think we disagree in the actual outcome, but i can say because of this valid point i have now a different more ambievalent view on the topic when it come to economic impact of boosting.
This is a plus in my book at least :smiley:

1 Like